Article info
PDFEditorial
Guest editorial: Charlie Gard’s five months in court: better dispute resolution mechanisms for medical futility disputes
- Correspondence to Dr Thaddeus Mason Pope, Health Law, Mitchell Hamline School of Law, Saint Paul, MN 55105, USA; thaddeus.pope{at}mitchellhamline.edu
Citation
Guest editorial: Charlie Gard’s five months in court: better dispute resolution mechanisms for medical futility disputes
Online issue publication
June 27, 2018
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Identifying futility in a paediatric critical care setting: a prospective observational study
- Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie Gard case
- The development of “medical futility”: towards a procedural approach based on the role of the medical profession
- When ethical reform became law: the constitutional concerns raised by recent legislation in Taiwan
- The human body as property? Possession, control and commodification
- Medical futility at the end of life: the perspectives of intensive care and palliative care clinicians
- Should patient consent be required to write a do not resuscitate order?
- Responding to complexity
- Conditions and consequences of medical futility—from a literature review to a clinical model
- Why the term ‘persistent therapy’ is not worse than the term ‘medical futility’