Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About

JME Commentaries
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Table of contents

July 2018 - Volume 44 - 7

Journal of Medical Ethics: 44 (7)

Editorials

Advancing independent adolescent consent for participation in HIV prevention research (12 June, 2018)
Seema K Shah, Susannah M Allison, Bill G Kapogiannis, Roberta Black, Liza Dawson, Emily Erbelding
Philosophical medical ethics: more necessary than ever (26 June, 2018)
Julian Savulescu, Thomas Douglas, Dominic Wilkinson
Guest editorial: Charlie Gard’s five months in court: better dispute resolution mechanisms for medical futility disputes (26 June, 2018)
Thaddeus Mason Pope

Charlie Gard

Hard lessons: learning from the Charlie Gard case (2 August, 2017) Free
Dominic Wilkinson, Julian Savulescu
Paper: Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie Gard case (18 May, 2018)
John J Paris, Brian M Cummings, Michael P Moreland, Jason N Batten
Paper: Charlie Gard and the weight of parental rights to seek experimental treatment (17 May, 2018)
Giles Birchley
Student essay: Ethical implications of medical crowdfunding: the case of Charlie Gard (4 May, 2018)
Gabrielle Dressler, Sarah A Kelly
Paper: Voices of moral authority: parents, doctors and what will actually help (3 May, 2018)
Richard David William Hain
Paper: Why Charlie Gard’s parents should have been the decision-makers about their son’s best interests (3 May, 2018)
Raanan Gillon
Paper: A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option? (3 May, 2018)
Jo Bridgeman
Paper: Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child? (7 June, 2018)
Richard Huxtable
Paper: Charlie Gard: in defence of the law (3 May, 2018) Free
Eliana Close, Lindy Willmott, Benjamin P White

Feature article

The job of ‘ethics committees’ (13 November, 2015) Free
Andrew Moore, Andrew Donnelly

Commentaries

The job of ‘ethics committees’ should be ethically informed code consistency review (25 February, 2016)
Søren Holm
The goodness of ethics in research ethics review (21 September, 2016)
Rosamond Rhodes
The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia (7 September, 2017)
Julian Savulescu
Code-consistent ethics review: defence of a hybrid account (12 May, 2016)
G Owen Schaefer
The ‘ethics committee’ job is administrative: a response to commentaries (29 March, 2018)
Andrew John Moore

Clinical ethics

Paper: Making medical decisions for an incompetent older adult when both a proxy and an advance directive are available: which is more likely to reflect the older adult’s preferences? (9 March, 2018)
Gina Bravo, Modou Sene, Marcel Arcand
Paper: Left Of Bang Interventions in Trauma: ethical implications for military medical prophylaxis (16 August, 2017)
Neil Eisenstein, David Naumann, Daniel Burns, Sarah Stapley, Heather Draper

Response

Left of bang interventions in trauma: some legal implications of military medical prophylaxis (13 February, 2018)
Rain Liivoja

Issue Information