Article info
PDFTheoretical ethics
Paper
Artificial gametes, the unnatural and the artefactual
- Correspondence to Dr Anna Smajdor, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo 0315, Norway; acsmajdor{at}gmail.com
Citation
Artificial gametes, the unnatural and the artefactual
Publication history
- Received May 1, 2017
- Revised January 15, 2018
- Accepted February 5, 2018
- First published March 5, 2018.
Online issue publication
May 24, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (5 March 2018).
- Previous version (4 May 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Multiplex parenting: IVG and the generations to come
- Artificial gametes: new paths to parenthood?
- In vitro eugenics
- Genetic generations: artificial gametes and the embryos produced with them
- Artificial gametes and the ethics of unwitting parenthood
- The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: a missed opportunity?
- Does egg donation for mitochondrial replacement techniques generate parental responsibilities?
- Planned changes in law on embryo research will hit researchers
- Gamete derivation from stem cells: revisiting the concept of genetic parenthood
- Ancestor embryos: embryonic gametes and genetic parenthood