In debates on the ethics of artificial gametes, concepts of naturalness have been used in a number of different ways. Some have argued that the unnaturalness of artificial gametes means that it is unacceptable to use them in fertility treatments. Others have suggested that artificial gametes are no less natural than many other tissues or processes in common medical use. We suggest that establishing the naturalness or unnaturalness of artificial gametes is unlikely to provide easy answers as to the acceptability of using them in fertility medicine. However, we also suggest that we should be cautious about repudiating any relationship between nature and moral evaluation. The property of being natural or man-made may not per se tell us anything about an entity’s moral status, but it has an important impact on the moral relationship between the creator and the created organism.
- evolution and creation
- genetic patents
- human tissue
- moral status
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Multiplex parenting: IVG and the generations to come
- Artificial gametes: new paths to parenthood?
- In vitro eugenics
- Genetic generations: artificial gametes and the embryos produced with them
- Artificial gametes and the ethics of unwitting parenthood
- The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: a missed opportunity?
- Does egg donation for mitochondrial replacement techniques generate parental responsibilities?
- Planned changes in law on embryo research will hit researchers
- Gamete derivation from stem cells: revisiting the concept of genetic parenthood
- Ancestor embryos: embryonic gametes and genetic parenthood