Article Text
Abstract
The predominant view is that a study using health data is observational research and should require individual consent unless it can be shown that gaining consent is impractical. But recent arguments have been made that citizens have an ethical obligation to share their health information for research purposes. In our view, this obligation is sufficient ground to expand the circumstances where secondary use research with identifiable health information is permitted without explicit subject consent. As such, for some studies the Institutional Review Board/Research Ethics Committee review process should not assess the practicality of gaining consent for data use. Instead the review process should focus on assessing the public good of the research, public engagement and transparency.
- informed consent
- research ethics
- distributive justice
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Both authors contributed to defining the topic of the paper, undertaking research and literature reviews, developing arguments, drafting and revising the text.
Funding Royal Society of New Zealand (Marsden Fund) UOO1515.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- In response to Ballantyne and Schaefer’s ‘Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research’
- Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
- Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
- Public interest in health data research: laying out the conceptual groundwork
- Assessing data protection and governance in health information systems: a novel methodology of Privacy and Ethics Impact and Performance Assessment (PEIPA)
- Making consent for electronic health and social care data research fit for purpose in the 21st century
- What constitutes equitable data sharing in global health research? A scoping review of the literature on low-income and middle-income country stakeholders’ perspectives
- Perceptions of the uses of routine general practice data beyond individual care in England: a qualitative study
- Machine learning models, trusted research environments and UK health data: ensuring a safe and beneficial future for AI development in healthcare
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust