Citation Tools
PDFCurrent controversy
Using best interests meetings for people in a prolonged disorder of consciousness to improve clinical and ethical management
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Using best interests meetings for people in a prolonged disorder of consciousness to improve clinical and ethical management
Other content recommended for you
- Back to the bedside? Making clinical decisions in patients with prolonged unconsciousness
- Serial measurement of Wessex Head Injury Matrix in the diagnosis of patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states: a cohort analysis
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- It is never lawful or ethical to withdraw life-sustaining treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- Causes and consequences of delays in treatment-withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of Cumbria NHS Clinical Commissioning Group v Miss S and Ors [2016] EWCOP 32
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the wrong answer is what the wrong question begets