Article Text
PDFCommentary
A flimsy case for the use of non-human primates in research: a reply to Arnason
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding This work has been supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Grant number: SFRH/BPD/116818/2016).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- Objections still fail: a response to Faria
- Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?
- Ethical issues when modelling brain disorders innon-human primates
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Driven to extinction? The ethics of eradicating mosquitoes with gene-drive technologies
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock