This response to Gail Henderson et al argues that they were right that interviewees’ appraisals of cure study participation should inform (future) protocol review decisions, but wrong to take these appraisals at face value.
- Clinical Trials
- Research Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors NE is the sole author.
Funding Writing this response was enabled by NIAID grant 1 R01 AI114617-01A1 (HIV cure studies: risk, risk perception, and ethics).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.