Article Text
Abstract
Bill 20, An Act to Enact the Act to promote access to family medicine and specialized medicine services and to amend various legislative provisions relating to assisted procreation, was introduced to reduce costs associated with Québec’s healthcare in general and in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in particular. Passed in November 2015, the new law introduces a number of exclusion criteria for access to and funding for IVF treatment. Remarkably, one exclusion criterion—prior voluntary sterilisation—has prompted little critical commentary. The two justifications offered for restricting funding for IVF on the basis of voluntary sterilisation are that (1) there are cheaper options than IVF for sterilised individuals who want children, and (2) society should not have to pay for IVF for persons who are infertile by choice. I argue that both of these justifications are unsatisfactory, insofar as they contravene the chief value underlying, and current practices of, Canadian healthcare, and rely on problematic ascriptions of personal responsibility for health.
- allocation of healthcare resources
- in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
- sterilization
- bill, laws and cases
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The Uppsala – Stockholm Assisted Reproductive Techniques (UppStART) study
- Predicting the chances of a live birth after one or more complete cycles of in vitro fertilisation: population based study of linked cycle data from 113 873 women
- Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF / ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles
- Induced endometrial trauma (endometrial scratch) in the mid-luteal menstrual cycle phase preceding first cycle IVF / ICSI versus usual IVF / ICSI therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Is it ethical to provide IVF add - ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it
- Neurological sequelae in twins born after assisted conception: controlled national cohort study
- Comparing the cumulative live birth rate of cleavage - stage versus blastocyst - stage embryo transfers between IVF cycles: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled superiority trial (the ToF trial)
- Impact of a nutritional supplement (Impryl) on male fertility: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, double - blind, placebo - controlled clinical trial (SUppleMent Male fERtility, SUMMER trial)
- Efficacy of dehydroepiandrosterone to overcome the effect of ovarian ageing (DITTO): a proof of principle randomised controlled trial protocol
- Increased risk of multiple sclerosis relapse after in vitro fertilisation