Article Text
Abstract
In 2016, a law came into force in France granting terminally ill patients the right to continuous deep sedation (CDS) until death. This right was proposed as an alternative to euthanasia and presented as the ‘French response’ to problems at the end of life. The law draws a distinction between CDS and euthanasia and other forms of sympton control at the end of life. France is the first country in the world to legislate on CDS . This short report describes the particular context and underlying social values that led to this piece of legislation, and explores its meaning in the wider French context.
- end-of-life
- law
- pain management
- euthanasia
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors The author is the only person who has contributed to the paper.
Funding This research was supported by the Well come Trust Society and Ethics Fellowship (100553/Z/12/Z).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Other content recommended for you
- Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life - sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Decision making and modes of death in a tertiary neonatal unit
- Comparison of attitudes towards five end - of - life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life - sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician - assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
- The role of religious beliefs in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life - sustaining treatment
- Distress from voluntary refusal of food and fluids to hasten death: what is the role of continuous deep sedation
- End - of - life decision - making in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland: does place of death make a difference
- Good medical ethics
- Short - term outcome of treatment limitation discussions for newborn infants, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study
- Can I trust them to do everything? The role of distrust in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life - sustaining treatment among Afro-Caribbean patients