Article info
PDFCommentary
‘Absolutely not!’ Contextual values and equality of voices in mental health
- Correspondence to Prof K W M Fulford, St. Catherine’s College, The Collaborating Centre for Values-based Practice in Health and Social Care, Oxford OX1 3UJ, UK; kwm.fulford{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
‘Absolutely not!’ Contextual values and equality of voices in mental health
Publication history
- Received August 21, 2017
- Accepted September 24, 2017
- First published October 22, 2017.
Online issue publication
February 22, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 October 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Promoting the freedom of thought of mental health service users: Nussbaum ’s capabilities approach meets values - based practice
- Reforming mental health law in England and Wales
- Harmful rights - doing? The perceived problem of liberal paradigms and public health
- The ethical imperative to scale up health care services for people with severe mental disorders in low and middle income countries
- Response to: ‘ Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies ’ by Schuklenk and Smalling
- How Chinese psychiatrists see and manage stigmatisation of psychiatric patients: a qualitative study in Hong Kong
- What brings asylum seekers to the United Kingdom
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Role of emotional capacity in consent should be clarified
- American biofutures: ideology and utopia in the Fukuyama / Stock debate