Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Marie Stenlund’s careful reading of values-based practice and her demonstration of its links with Martha Nussbaum’s Capabilities Framework are innovative theoretically and have potentially important implications for policy and practice in mental health. As she indicates the two approaches converge in a number of key respects. Notably, both recognise the diversity of individual human values. This diversity crucially underpins contemporary person-centred conceptions of recovery in mental health based on quality of life as defined by reference to the values of (to what is important from the perspective of) the person concerned rather than that of a generic professional ‘needs assessment’.1 2
Where the two theories diverge, too, Stenlund finds practically important consequences. Thus Nussbaum’s Capabilities Framework, as Stenlund indicates, is outcomes-oriented, while values-based practice focuses on process. The two approaches are not however thereby necessarily inconsistent. Drawing on early accounts of values-based practice (from 2006 and 2009), Stenlund suggests a degree of implicit blurring between it and Nussbaum’s capabilities. Here we need to be careful: values-based practice does not (as Stenlund suggests) regard recovery as an outcome; it …
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
- Political philosophy & medical ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Promoting the freedom of thought of mental health service users: Nussbaum’s capabilities approach meets values-based practice
- Recovery-oriented social work practice in mental health and addictions: a scoping review protocol
- Health impact of human rights testimony: harming the most vulnerable?
- An analysis of tax abuse, debt, and climate change risk in low-income and lower-middle-income countries
- Collaborative risk assessment in secure and forensic mental health settings in the UK
- The human rights responsibilities of multinational tobacco companies
- Civilian perception of the role of the military in Nigeria’s 2014 Ebola outbreak and health-related responses in the North East region
- Preventive detention: the ethical ground where politics and health meet. Focus on asylum seekers in Australia
- Selection, training, and support of relief workers: an occupational health issue
- Population-based survey methods to quantify associations between human rights violations and health outcomes among internally displaced persons in eastern Burma