Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Chris Durante’s comments on my article about the compatibility of universal morality, particular moralities and multiculturalism indicate that we have very different approaches to and understandings of these three notions. Durante investigates multiculturalism from the perspective of political philosophy, whereas my approach is grounded in moral rather than political philosophy. Since he refers to his framework as an ‘ethico-political theory’, he may regard his account as a synthesis of moral and political philosophy, but this representation seems incorrect. He repeatedly refers to his discussions of multiculturalism using the language of ‘political ethics’, ‘political theory’, ‘political philosophy’, ‘political system’, ‘political ramifications’, ‘political order’, ‘political liberalism’, ‘political community’, ‘political society’, ‘political principles’ and related concepts. He bluntly states his view about the centrality of political theory: ‘Multiculturalism…is primarily concerned with establishing a political system with moral undertones rather than a moral system with political ramifications’.
I take the reverse view. Durante assumes without argument that multiculturalism finds its origins and home in political philosophy; by contrast, I envision multiculturalism as primarily a moral theory about obligations to tolerate moral differences in the face of conflicts between cultural groups. I do not deny that political philosophy is relevant to the resolution of various problems of multicultural …
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Extended essay
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles
- What principlism misses
- An argument for intolerance
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Does bioethics exist?
- A little toleration, please
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”