Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Paper
Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion
  1. Valerie Fleming1,
  2. Beate Ramsayer2,
  3. Teja Škodič Zakšek3
  1. 1 Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
  2. 2 Midwife, Oberhausen-Berg, Germany
  3. 3 Department of Midwifery, Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Valerie Fleming, LIverpool John Moores University, 79 Tithebarn St, Liverpool L2 2ER, UK; v.fleming{at}ljmu.ac.uk

Abstract

While abortion has been legal in most developed countries for many years, the topic remains controversial. A major area of controversy concerns women’s rights vis-a-vis the rights of health professionals to opt out of providing the service on conscience grounds. Although scholars from various disciplines have addressed this issue in the literature, there is a lack of empirical research on the topic. This paper provides a documentary analysis of three examples of conscientious objection on religious grounds to performing abortion-related care by midwives in different Member States of the European Union, two of which have resulted in legal action. These examples show that as well as the laws of the respective countries and the European Union, professional and church law each played a part in the decisions made. However, support from both professional and religious sources was inconsistent both within and between the examples. The authors conclude that there is a need for clear guidelines at both local and pan-European level for health professionals and recommend a European-wide forum to develop and test them.

  • abortion
  • conscientious objection
  • human dignity
  • interests of health personnel/institutions

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles