Article info

Download PDFPDF
Reviewing code consistency is important, but research ethics committees must also make a judgement on scientific justification, methodological approach and competency of the research team

Authors

  1. Correspondence to Dr Simon Kolstoe, School of Health Sciences and Social Work, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2FR, UK; simon.kolstoe{at}port.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Trace S, Kolstoe S
Reviewing code consistency is important, but research ethics committees must also make a judgement on scientific justification, methodological approach and competency of the research team

Publication history

  • Received August 13, 2018
  • Accepted August 29, 2018
  • First published September 14, 2018.
Online issue publication 
November 22, 2018

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Other content recommended for you