Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Reviewing code consistency is important, but research ethics committees must also make a judgement on scientific justification, methodological approach and competency of the research team

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors SK and ST conducted the supporting work described in this commentary and contributed equally to writing the article.

  • Competing interests SK is chair of the Hampshire A NHS and MOD research ethics committees and is involved with various NHS and MOD projects trying to improve and streamline the ethics review process. ST is a member of the Hampshire B NHS REC and is currently receiving funding for her MRes degree from the Health Research Authority.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Additional information regarding the ShED audits is available in the form of internal reports from the Health Research Authority.

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. 'It is not the task of a REC to undertake additional scientific reviewer is it constituted to do so’ was corrected.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Feature article
    Andrew Moore Andrew Donnelly

Other content recommended for you