Article info
PDFExtended essay
In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Correspondence to Dr Shahla Siddiqui, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore 768828, Singapore; shahlasi{at}yahoo.com
Citation
In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
Publication history
- Received December 6, 2016
- Revised June 1, 2018
- Accepted June 9, 2018
- First published June 28, 2018.
Online issue publication
November 22, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 November 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Video decision aids to assist with advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- A new law on advance directives in Germany
- Whose decision? Whose practice?
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Ethical issues of resuscitation: an American perspective
- ‘To treat or not to treat’. Kerrie Wooltorton, lessons to learn
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
- Complex advance care planning interventions for chronic serious illness: how do they work? a scoping review
- Patients' perspectives of the substitute decision maker: who makes better decisions?