Article Text
Abstract
This paper will discuss why and how social network sites ought to be used in surrogate decision making (SDM), with focus on a context like Singapore in which substituted judgment is incorporated as part of best interest assessment for SDM, as guided by the Code of Practice for making decisions for those lacking mental capacity under the Mental Capacity Act (2008). Specifically, the paper will argue that the Code of Practice already supports an ethical obligation, as part of a patient-centred care approach, to look for and appraise social network site (SNS) as a source of information for best interest decision making. As an important preliminary, the paper will draw on Berg’s arguments to support the use of SNS information as a resource for SDM. It will also supplement her account for how SNS information ought to be weighed against or considered alongside other evidence of patient preference or wishes, such as advance directives and anecdotal accounts by relatives.
- decision-making
- elderly and terminally ill
- information technology
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Original work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Video decision aids to assist with advance care planning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- A new law on advance directives in Germany
- Whose decision? Whose practice?
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Ethical issues of resuscitation: an American perspective
- ‘To treat or not to treat’. Kerrie Wooltorton, lessons to learn
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
- Complex advance care planning interventions for chronic serious illness: how do they work? a scoping review
- Patients' perspectives of the substitute decision maker: who makes better decisions?