Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Paper
The need for donor consent in mitochondrial replacement
- Correspondence to Dr G Owen Schaefer, Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 117597, Singapore; medgos{at}nus.edu.sg
Citation
The need for donor consent in mitochondrial replacement
Publication history
- Received November 9, 2017
- Revised May 18, 2018
- Accepted June 20, 2018
- First published July 12, 2018.
Online issue publication
November 22, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 November 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Should mitochondrial replacement therapy be funded by the National Health Service?
- A brief and personal history of ‘what’s in a name’ in reproductive genetics
- Mitochondrial replacement techniques for treating infertility
- Using stem cell-derived gametes for same-sex reproduction: an alternative scenario
- Does egg donation for mitochondrial replacement techniques generate parental responsibilities?
- Social egg freezing and donation: waste not, want not
- Consent agreements for cryopreserved embryos: the case for choice
- ‘No’ to lesbian motherhood using human nuclear genome transfer
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate