Disability discrimination and misdirected criticism of the quality-adjusted life year framework

David G T Whitehurst; Lidia Engel

doi:10.1136/medethics-2016-104066

Article menu

Article
Text
Article
info
Citation
Tools
Share
Rapid Responses
Article
metrics
Alerts

PDF

Response

Disability discrimination and misdirected criticism of the quality-adjusted life year framework

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.

Share This Article:

Email this article to a friend

We will not keep your email address; we ask for it so your friend knows the email isn't spam.

Your email: *

Your name: *

Send to: *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following Disability discrimination and misdirected criticism of the quality-adjusted life year framework

Message subject: (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Medical Ethics

Message body: (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of Medical Ethics web site.

Your personal message:

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password

For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?

Forgot your user name or password?

Other content recommended for you

Preference-based disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for glaucoma: a mixed methods study protocol
Sergei Muratov et al., BMJ Open, 2016
Developing a cerebral palsy-specific preference-based measure for a six-dimensional classification system (CP-6D): protocol for a valuation study
Mina Bahrampour et al., BMJ Open, 2019
Public versus patient health preferences: protocol for a study to elicit EQ-5D-5L health state valuations for patients who have survived a stay in intensive care
Christine Marie Bækø Halling et al., BMJ Open, 2022
International guidelines for self-report and proxy completion of paediatric health-related quality of life measures: a protocol for a systematic review
Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa et al., BMJ Open, 2021
Producing a preference-based quality of life measure for people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a mixed-methods study protocol
Philip A Powell et al., BMJ Open, 2019
Valuation study for a preference-based quality of life measure for dental caries (Dental Caries Utility Index - DCUI) among Australian adolescents - study protocol
Ruvini Hettiarachchi et al., BMJ Open, 2020
Developing a dementia-specific preference-based quality of life measure (AD-5D) in Australia: a valuation study protocol
Tracy A Comans et al., BMJ Open, 2018
Quality-adjusted life years
Yolanda Bravo Vergel et al., Practical Neurology, 2008
Comparison of the CHU-9D and the EQ-5D-Y instruments in children and young people with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study
Jennifer M Ryan et al., BMJ Open, 2020
Developing a preference-based measure for weight-specific health-related quality of life in adolescence: the WAItE UK valuation study protocol
Tomos Robinson et al., BMJ Open, 2021

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Share this article

Email this article to a friend

Request permissions

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password

Other content recommended for you