Article info
PDFResponse
Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test
- Correspondence to Dr Wendy Elizabeth Bonython, School of Law and Justice, Faculty of Business Government and Law, Locked Bag 1, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; wendy.bonython{at}canberra.edu.au
Citation
Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test
Publication history
- Received June 29, 2016
- Revised November 6, 2016
- Accepted July 11, 2017
- First published August 20, 2017.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 October 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Direct-to-consumer genetic testing
- Knowing me, knowing you
- Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
- A practical guide to interpretation and clinical application of personal genomic screening
- Privacy, autonomy and direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a response to Vayena
- The right to know and genetic testing
- FDA faces regulatory challenges with new approaches to medicine
- Use of SNP chips to detect rare pathogenic variants: retrospective, population based diagnostic evaluation