Article info
PDFExtended essay
Conflicting duties and restitution of the trusting relationship
- Correspondence to Dr Andreas Eriksen, ARENA - Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0318, Norway; anderik{at}arena.uio.no
Citation
Conflicting duties and restitution of the trusting relationship
Publication history
- Received November 30, 2017
- Revised March 23, 2018
- Accepted May 16, 2018
- First published June 15, 2018.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 June 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Rescuing the duty to rescue
- Respect for autonomy: deciding what is good for oneself
- Healthcare professionals ’ responsibility for informing relatives at risk of hereditary disease
- A surrogate ’s secrets are (n’t) safe with me: patient confidentiality in the care of a gestational surrogate
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Is risk stratification ever the same as ‘ profiling ’
- Clarifying and defending the endorsed life approach to surrogate decision - making
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices
- Duty to provide care to Ebola patients: the perspectives of Guinean lay people and healthcare providers
- Duties to rescue: individual, professional and institutional