Article info
Public health ethics
Paper
How do policymakers interpret and implement the principle of equivalence with regard to prison health? A qualitative study among key policymakers in England
- Correspondence to Nasrul Ismail, Centre for Public Health and Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK; Nasrul.Ismail{at}uwe.ac.uk
Citation
How do policymakers interpret and implement the principle of equivalence with regard to prison health? A qualitative study among key policymakers in England
Publication history
- Received December 6, 2017
- Revised May 14, 2018
- Accepted June 22, 2018
- First published July 12, 2018.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (12 July 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Mapping palliative care provision in European prisons: an EAPC Task Force Survey
- Leaving no one behind in prison: improving the health of people in prison as a key contributor to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals 2030
- Evaluation of a health system strengthening initiative in the Zambian prison system
- ‘Equivalence of care’ in prison medicine: is equivalence of process the right measure of equity?
- The prison service is still failing inmates’ healthcare needs
- Dementia-friendly prisons: a mixed-methods evaluation of the application of dementia-friendly community principles to two prisons in England
- UK news media representations of smoking, smoking policies and tobacco bans in prisons
- Views of prison staff in Scotland on the potential benefits and risks of e-cigarettes in smoke-free prisons: a qualitative focus group study
- Smoke-free prisons in England: indoor air quality before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy
- Using telemedicine to improve access, cost and quality of secondary care for people in prison in England: a hybrid type 2 implementation effectiveness study