Article Text
Abstract
Recent years have seen the rise of ‘Just Culture’ as an ideal in the patient safety movement, with numerous hospitals and professional organisations adopting a Just Culture response to incidents ranging from non-culpable human error to intentional misconduct. This paper argues that there is a deep problem with the Just Culture model, resulting from its impoverished understanding of the value of punitive, fundamentally backward-looking, practices of holding people accountable. I show that the kind of ‘accountability’ and ‘punishment’ contemporary Just Culture advocates endorse disrespects both patients and providers. I claim, first, that punishment is good because it respects participants in the healthcare system by restoring an equilibrium of social and moral status that wrongdoing disturbs, and, second, that it only does so when it communicates a backward-looking message of resentful blame.
- medical error
- ethics
- philosophical ethics
- persons
- moral psychology
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Personal accountability in healthcare: searching for the right balance
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Improving responses to safety incidents: we need to talk about justice
- Requirements for implementing a ‘just culture’ within healthcare organisations: an integrative review
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- African perspectives of moral status: a framework for evaluating global bioethical issues
- Pregnancy and superior moral status: a proposal for two thresholds of personhood
- Medical error in the care of the unrepresented: disclosure and apology for a vulnerable patient population
- Highlights from this issue
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan