Article Text
Abstract
Research from behavioural sciences shows that people reach decisions in a much less rational and well-considered way than was often assumed. The doctrine of informed consent, which is an important ethical principle and legal requirement in medical practice, is being challenged by these insights into decision-making and real-world choice behaviour. This article discusses the implications of recent insights of research on decision-making behaviour for the informed consent doctrine. It concludes that there is a significant tension between the often non-rational choice behaviour and the traditional theory of informed consent. Responsible ways of dealing with or solving these problems are considered. To this end, patient decisions aids (PDAs) are discussed as suitable interventions to support autonomous decision-making. However, current PDAs demand certain improvements in order to protect and promote autonomous decision-making. Based on a conception of autonomy, we will argue which type of improvements are needed.
- informed consent
- decision-making
- autonomy
- psychology
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors All three authors contributed to the conception, writing and editing of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Formal and effective autonomy in healthcare
- Patient preferences for autonomy in decision making in asthma management
- Decision-making autonomy in maternal health service use and associated factors among women in Mettu District, Southwest Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study
- Making decisions at the end of life when caring for a person with dementia: a literature review to explore the potential use of heuristics in difficult decision-making
- Autonomy and negatively informed consent
- Ethics of the fiduciary relationship between patient and physician: the case of informed consent
- Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing
- Why effective consent presupposes autonomous authorisation: a counterorthodox argument
- Green bioethics, patient autonomy and informed consent in healthcare
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?