Article info
PDFThe concise argument
Different ways to argue about medical ethics
- Correspondence to Professor John R McMillan, Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; john.r.mcmillan68{at}gmail.com
Citation
Different ways to argue about medical ethics
Publication history
- First published October 25, 2018.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2018
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Adab and its significance for an Islamic medical ethics
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Medical ethics: principles, persons, and perspectives: from controversy to conversation
- Can one do good medical ethics without principles?
- Fair, just and compassionate: A pilot for making allocation decisions for patients requesting experimental drugs outside of clinical trials
- Why not common morality?
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views
- Identifying ethical values for guiding triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic: an Italian ethical committee perspective using Delphi methodology