Article info
PDFResponse
Autonomy, nudging and post-truth politics
- Correspondence to Geoff Keeling, Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL, UK; gk16226{at}bristol.ac.uk
Citation
Autonomy, nudging and post-truth politics
Publication history
- Received October 12, 2017
- Accepted November 1, 2017
- First published November 16, 2017.
Online issue publication
August 21, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Parental obligation and compelled caesarean section: careful analogies and reliable reasoning about individual cases
- Nudges in a post-truth world
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing
- Good parents would not fulfil their obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children
- Physician-assisted dying and two senses of an incurable condition
- Rights