Article info
PDFExtended essay
In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
- Correspondence to Dr Mark Sheehan, Nuffield Department of Population Health, The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; mark.sheehan{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
Publication history
- Received June 20, 2017
- Revised July 31, 2017
- Accepted September 24, 2017
- First published October 10, 2017.
Online issue publication
September 25, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (10 October 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
- Response to Sheehan et al’s ‘In defence of governance: ethics review and social research’
- Getting the justification for research ethics review right
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Diversity of scholarship in medical ethics
- Snakes and ladders: state interventions and the place of liberty in public health policy
- Research with children and young people: not on them. What can we learn from the non-clinical research?
- Meeting the needs of underserved populations: setting the agenda for more inclusive citizen science of medicine
- A model for clinical governance in primary care groups
- Ethics and opportunity costs: have NICE grasped the ethics of priority setting?