There is a growing body of literature that has sought to undermine systems of ethical regulation, and governance more generally, within the social sciences. In this paper, we argue that any general claim for a system of research ethics governance in social research depends on clarifying the nature of the stake that society has in research. We show that certain accounts of this stake—protecting researchers’ freedoms; ensuring accountability for resources; safeguarding welfare; and supporting democracy—raise relevant ethical considerations that are reasonably contested. However, these accounts cannot underpin a general claim in favour of, or against, a system of research ethics governance. Instead, we defend governance in social research on the grounds that research, as an institutionalised form of enquiry, is a constitutive element of human flourishing, and that society ought to be concerned with the flourishing of its members. We conclude by considering the governance arrangements that follow from, and are justified by, our arguments.
- research ethics
- ethics governance
- social research
- research ethics committees
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
- Response to Sheehan et al’s ‘In defence of governance: ethics review and social research’
- Getting the justification for research ethics review right
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- Diversity of scholarship in medical ethics
- Snakes and ladders: state interventions and the place of liberty in public health policy
- Research with children and young people: not on them. What can we learn from the non-clinical research?
- Meeting the needs of underserved populations: setting the agenda for more inclusive citizen science of medicine
- A model for clinical governance in primary care groups
- Ethics and opportunity costs: have NICE grasped the ethics of priority setting?