Article info
PDFExtended essay
Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Correspondence to Dr Anna-Karin Margareta Andersson, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, The University of Tromsø, Tromsø N-9037, Norway; anna-karin.m.andersson{at}uit.no
Citation
Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
Publication history
- Received May 9, 2016
- Revised November 29, 2017
- Accepted February 6, 2018
- First published March 2, 2018.
Online issue publication
August 21, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Consent for anaesthesia
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor
- Patients' perspectives of the substitute decision maker: who makes better decisions?
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- Why we should stop using animal-derived products on patients without their consent
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present