Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: Response
Law and the perils of philosophical grafts
- Correspondence to Professor Richard E Ashcroft, School of Law, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK; r.ashcroft{at}qmul.ac.uk
Citation
Law and the perils of philosophical grafts
Publication history
- Received August 9, 2017
- Accepted September 24, 2017
- First published October 22, 2017.
Online issue publication
December 18, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 December 2017).
- Previous version (18 December 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Consent and end of life decisions
- How medical students learn ethics: an online log of their learning experiences
- Towards a European code of medical ethics. Ethical and legal issues
- Medical ethics and law for doctors of tomorrow: the 1998 Consensus Statement updated
- Evolving legal responses to dependence on families in New Zealand and Singapore healthcare
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Accounting for personhood in palliative sedation: the Ring Theory of Personhood
- Will international human rights subsume medical ethics? Intersections in the UNESCO Universal Bioethics Declaration
- The relationship between medical law and good medical ethics