Article Text
Abstract
Philosophers and bioethicists are typically sceptical about invocations of dignity in ethical debates. Many believe that dignity is essentially devoid of meaning: either a mere rhetorical gesture used in the absence of good argument or a faddish term for existing values like autonomy and respect. On the other hand, the patient experience of dignity is a substantial area of research in healthcare fields like nursing and palliative care. In this paper, it is argued that philosophers have much to learn from the concrete patient experiences described in healthcare literature. Dignity is conferred on people when they are treated as having equal status, something the sick and frail are often denied in healthcare settings. The importance of equal status as a unique value has been forcefully argued and widely recognised in political philosophy in the last 15 years. This paper brings medical ethics up to date with philosophical discussion about the value of equal status by developing an equal status conception of dignity.
- human dignity
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Dignity: not such a useless concept
- Dignity and equality in healthcare
- Blowing the whistle on mixed gender hospital rooms in Australia and New Zealand: a human rights issue
- Human dignity and human tissue: a meaningful ethical relationship?
- Making sense of dignity
- Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy-making
- Flourishing is not a conception of dignity
- Dignity is a useless concept
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights