This paper considers the meaning of the term ‘intrusive research’, as used in the UK Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA), in relation to studies in which an informant is asked to provide information about or on behalf of a person who lacks capacity to consent, and who is not otherwise involved in the study. The MCA defines ‘intrusive research’ as research that would legally require consent if it involved people with capacity. The relevant ethical principles are that consent should be sought from people who would be affected by a piece of research and that this requirement should be implemented proportionately. The critical question, for investigators and research ethics committees, is: would provision of the personal information specified in the research protocol significantly affect a person whose capacity is not impaired? If the answer to this question is ‘no’, then the study falls outside the definition of ‘intrusive research’, and the MCA does not apply.
- Research Ethics
- Legal Aspects
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- How are adults with capacity-affecting conditions and associated communication difficulties included in ethically sound research? A documentary-based survey of ethical review and recruitment processes under the research provisions of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) for England and Wales
- Impact of the demand for ‘proxy assent’ on recruitment to a randomised controlled trial of vaccination testing in care homes
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Participation in dementia research: rates and correlates of capacity to give informed consent
- Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements?
- Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines
- Guideline for obtaining valid consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures
- Deprivation of liberty safeguards: how prepared are we?
- Developing a new model for patient recruitment in mental health services: a cohort study using Electronic Health Records