Article Text
PDFAuthor meets critics: precis
Identity, Personhood and the Law: Charles Foster and Jonathan Herring. Springer, 2017: ISBN 978-3-319-53458-9: 70 pp.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics: Response
- Author meets critics: Response
- Author meets critics: Response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life - prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Court applications for withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a permanent vegetative state: family experiences
- Ethical issues in diagnosis and management of patients in the permanent vegetative state
- Causes and consequences of delays in treatment - withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of Cumbria NHS Clinical Commissioning Group v Miss S and Ors [2016] EWCOP 32
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘ Why I wrote my advance decision ’
- Consent and end of life decisions
- Withholding artificial nutrition and hydration
- Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the wrong answer is what the wrong question begets
- When ‘ Sanctity of Life ’ and ‘ Self - Determination ’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice