Article info
PDFGenetics
Student Essay
Designing Methuselah: an ethical argument against germline genetic modification to prolong human longevity
- Correspondence to Isabelle L Robertson, St Hilda's Collegiate School, 2 Cobden St., City Rise, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; issierobertson{at}gmail.com
Citation
Designing Methuselah: an ethical argument against germline genetic modification to prolong human longevity
Publication history
- Received February 13, 2017
- Revised March 28, 2017
- Accepted April 6, 2017
- First published April 27, 2017.
Online issue publication
December 21, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (29 August 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Comparative ethical evaluation of epigenome editing and genome editing in medicine: first steps and future directions
- Is it better to die than to be lonely?
- Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- CRISPR-Cas9: a new and promising player in gene therapy
- Sport and exercise genomics: the FIMS 2019 consensus statement update
- Ethics of modifying the mitochondrial genome
- Experts back genome editing in human embryo research
- Heritable human genome editing is ‘currently not permitted’, but it is no longer ‘prohibited’: so says the ISSCR
- CRISPR immunity: a case study for justified somatic genetic modification?