Designing Methuselah: an ethical argument against germline genetic modification to prolong human longevity
Other content recommended for you
- Is it better to die than to be lonely?
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- CRISPR-Cas9: a new and promising player in gene therapy
- Sport and exercise genomics: the FIMS 2019 consensus statement update
- Ethics of modifying the mitochondrial genome
- Experts back genome editing in human embryo research
- Heritable human genome editing is ‘currently not permitted’, but it is no longer ‘prohibited’: so says the ISSCR
- CRISPR immunity: a case study for justified somatic genetic modification?
- The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification
- Everything in moderation, even hype: learning from vaccine controversies to strike a balance with CRISPR