The aim of shared decision-making (SDM) is to provide information to patients in order to enable them to decide autonomously and freely about treatment together with the doctor, without interference, force or coercion by others. Relatives may be considered as hindering or impeding a patient's own decision. Qualitative-empirical research into lived experience of SDM of patients with cancer, however, problematises the patient's autonomy when facing terminal illness and the need to make decisions regarding treatment. Confronted with this difficulty, this contribution tries to think through patients' dependency of others, and make their autonomy more relational, drawing on care-ethical critics of a one-sided view of autonomy and on Ricoeur's view of the fundamentally intersubjective, relational self. We aim to conceptualise relatives not as a third party next to the doctor and the patient, but as co-constituents of the patient's identity and as such present in the decision-making process from the outset. What is more, partners and the family may be of inestimable help in retrieving the patient's identity in line with the past, present and possible future.
- Philosophical Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ability of observer and self-report measures to capture shared decision-making in clinical practice in the UK: a mixed-methods study
- Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review
- Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
- Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
- Shared decision-making is not common in clinical practice
- Collaborative risk assessment in secure and forensic mental health settings in the UK
- Professionals’ views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis
- Shared decision-making as a method of care
- Addressing disparities in patients’ opportunities for and competencies in shared decision making
- What are the links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in training programs for junior doctors? A scoping review protocol