Background Situations of disaster that prompt international humanitarian responses are rife with ethical tensions. The 2010 Haiti earthquake caused great destruction and prompted a massive humanitarian response. The widespread needs experienced by the population and the scale of the response inevitably rendered priority-setting difficult, and gave rise to ethical challenges.
Purpose This paper presents four ethical questions identified in the analysis of a study on vulnerability and equity in the humanitarian response to the 2010 Haiti earthquake.
Methods Using interpretive description methodology, the interdisciplinary research team analysed 24 semi-structured in-depth interviews conducted with expatriate and Haitian health workers and decision-makers involved in the response.
Results Ethical questions identified through the analysis were: (1) How should limited resources be allocated in situations of widespread vulnerability and elevated needs? (2) At what point does it become ethically problematic to expend (considerable) resources to sustain expatriate disaster responders? (3) How ought rapid and reactive interventions be balanced with more deliberated and coordinated approaches? (4) What trade-offs are justified when interventions to address acute needs could contribute to long-term vulnerabilities?
Discussion The questions arise in light of an immense gap between available resources and widespread and elevated needs. This gap is likely unavoidable in large-scale crises and may be a source of ethical distress for both local and international responders. The analysis of ethical questions associated with crisis response can advance discussions about how relief efforts can best be designed and implemented to minimise ethical distress and improve assistance to local populations.
- Distributive Justice
- Emergency Medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Twitter Follow Evelyne Durocher @.
Funding This study was conducted as part of the Montreal Health Equity Research Consortium through a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (ROH 115214). MH is supported by a research scholar award from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Santé. ED postdoctoral fellowship was supported by the Montreal Health Equity Research Consortium, a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (EOG-120255), and the Foundation of the Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval REBs at McGill University, University of Montreal and National Bioethics Committee of Haiti.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement The unpublished data from the study are available to the members of the research team who are listed as authors on this paper. The data are being written up into manuscripts as described in the cover letter.