Article info
PDFResponse
Paternalism, reasonableness, and neutrality: a response to commentators
- Correspondence to Professor Frances Kamm, Department of Philosophy, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; frances_kamm{at}harvard.edu
Citation
Paternalism, reasonableness, and neutrality: a response to commentators
Publication history
- Received July 10, 2017
- Accepted July 12, 2017
- First published August 9, 2017.
Online issue publication
December 21, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (21 December 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
- Ulysses Contracts in psychiatric care: helping patients to protect themselves from spiralling
- Kant on euthanasia and the duty to die: clearing the air
- ‘He who helps the guilty, shares the crime’? INGOs, moral narcissism and complicity in wrongdoing
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Should medical ethics justify violence?
- Medical involvement in torture today?
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- Scientific research is a moral duty