Article Text
PDFCommentary
Patient autonomy and professional expertise in decisions near the end of life: commentary on Francis Kamm
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i Citation to Kamm's paper
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- Advanced and end of life care: cautionary suggestions
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity
- Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance—systematic review and narrative synthesis
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Accounting for personhood in palliative sedation: the Ring Theory of Personhood
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- Kidney failure end-of-life care: impact of advance care planning – retrospective observational study