Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
In her essay, Francis Kamm discusses a broad range of issues surrounding care near the end of life, as examined through the lens of three position papers and two studies.i Her comments remind me of the value that good philosophical analysis brings to the work of clinicians; Kamm accurately and perceptively uncovers areas of ambiguity and outright inconsistency that are very relevant to how we approach the many challenges that arise in providing care to those who are near the end of their lives.
This being said, position papers and research studies provide only a narrow window into understanding what actually happens during the care of patients. My goal in this commentary is to build some clinical context around Kamm's observations. In particular, I will focus on a recurrent theme in Kamm's essay, which she summarises as follows: ‘While professionals… typically begin with calls to attend to preferences of a person…, they seem to have aims beyond guiding care according to those preferences and view these aims as having objective value. In particular, while a ground given for attending to patients’ preferences is that views on what constitutes a good death vary, many professionals have a particular view of what a good death is and hope to promote it for what they see as patients’ own good.’
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i Citation to Kamm's paper
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- Advanced and end of life care: cautionary suggestions
- Decision-making in palliative care: patient and family caregiver concordance and discordance—systematic review and narrative synthesis
- Making patient values visible in healthcare: a systematic review of tools to assess patient treatment priorities and preferences in the context of multimorbidity
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Accounting for personhood in palliative sedation: the Ring Theory of Personhood
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- Kidney failure end-of-life care: impact of advance care planning – retrospective observational study