Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics
On emergencies and emigration: how (not) to justify compulsory medical service
- Correspondence to Dr Michael Blake, Department of Philosophy, University of Washington, Box 353350, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA; miblake{at}uw.edu
Citation
On emergencies and emigration: how (not) to justify compulsory medical service
Publication history
- Received March 18, 2016
- Accepted March 30, 2016
- First published April 20, 2016.
Online issue publication
July 26, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 July 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Identifying and managing deprivation of liberty in adults in England and Wales
- Ethics of selective restriction of liberty in a pandemic
- What is wrong with the emergency justification of compulsory medical service?
- Health professionals and human rights campaigners: different cultures, shared goals
- Human rights in pandemics: criminal and punitive approaches to COVID-19
- Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
- Life in the cloud and freedom of speech
- Human rights and bioethics
- Reproduction misconceived: why there is no right to reproduce and the implications for ART access
- Embryonic stem cell research is not dehumanising us