Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics
The missing evidence in favour of restricting emigration
- Correspondence to Javier S Hidalgo, Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, 28 Westhampton Way, Jepson Hall, Richmond, VA 23173, USA; hidalgoj{at}gmail.com
Citation
The missing evidence in favour of restricting emigration
Publication history
- Received October 23, 2015
- Accepted January 6, 2016
- First published January 29, 2016.
Online issue publication
July 26, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 July 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Relevant evidence, reasonable policy and the right to emigrate
- What is wrong with the emergency justification of compulsory medical service?
- Defending the active recruitment of health workers: a response to commentators
- The active recruitment of health workers: a defence
- Empirical Bioethics and the Health ‘Brain-Drain’: a qualitative study of the experiential and ethical landscape of compulsory community service for a group of South African doctors
- Is active recruitment of health workers really not guilty of enabling harm or facilitating wrongdoing?
- Managing medical migration from poor countries
- What should be done to address losses associated with ‘medical brain drain’?
- On emergencies and emigration: how (not) to justify compulsory medical service
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation