Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Commentary on: ‘Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?’
Funding Research informing this commentary has been partially supported by a University of Sydney Medical School New Staff Grant: ‘Future autonomy, current technology: ethics and next generation gene sequencing in children’.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i A side issue, beyond the scope of this commentary, is how studies like the Genome Clinic are contributing to slippage between research and clinical practice as traditionally conceived.
↵ii Personal communication, Dr Lisa Dive.
↵iii A potential (albeit controversial) modification to this protocol would be to make disclosure of adult-onset SVs in child participants contingent on the child's parents already having consented to such testing for themselves.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genomic intensive care: should we perform genome testing in critically ill newborns?
- Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?
- Genomic testing for children with interstitial and diffuse lung disease (chILD): parent satisfaction, understanding and health-related quality of life
- Cancer patients’ views and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative study
- Genomics for paediatricians: promises and pitfalls
- Two-step offer and return of multiple types of additional genomic findings to families after ultrarapid trio genomic testing in the acute care setting: a study protocol
- The 100 000 Genomes Project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS
- Comprehensive evaluation of a prospective Australian patient cohort with suspected genetic kidney disease undergoing clinical genomic testing: a study protocol
- Case for genome sequencing in infants and children with rare, undiagnosed or genetic diseases
- Delivering genome sequencing in clinical practice: an interview study with healthcare professionals involved in the 100 000 Genomes Project