Background Conducting non-therapeutic research is ethically challenging because participation conveys risks and burden and no health benefit. In this paper, we report the positive experiences of a diverse group of healthy and ill children (6–18 years) who participated in non-therapeutic research studies and discuss whether these positive experiences can justifiably be viewed as benefits.
Methods We used semistructured interviews from an earlier study about children's experiences in clinical research and did a secondary analysis on the positive experiences of the children in the non-therapeutic studies (N=30). Interviews were analysed using ‘thematic’ analysis.
Results The interviewed children most frequently mentioned as positive experiences of non-therapeutic research participation helping others and the gratification that comes with it, possible health benefits in the future, having fun and new/increased knowledge about the human body, hospitals and doing research. Less frequently mentioned were getting a present, not having to go to school and getting extra attention from healthcare staff.
Conclusions Our study shows that children participating in non-therapeutic research have various positive experiences while taking part. We argue that some of these justifiably could be taken into the risk–benefit analysis in certain situations or maybe even as a standard part of this analysis. This may help to increase the number of (crucial) non-therapeutic studies with children.
- Research Ethics
- Ethics Committees/Consultation
- Policy Guidelines/Inst. Review Boards/Review Cttes.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors MSS carried out the data collection and analysis of the study. She drafted the initial manuscript of the article and revised the manuscript according to the comments of the other authors. JAMH critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. SvdV analysed part of the data, critically reviewed and revised the manuscript from a bioethical perspective. All authors approved the final version of this article.
Funding All phases of this study were supported by ZonMw (grant 113203202).
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- School dropout: a major public health challenge: a 10-year prospective study on medical and non-medical social insurance benefits in young adulthood, the Young-HUNT 1 Study (Norway)
- Hearing the voices of children: self-reported information on children's experiences during research procedures: a study protocol
- Family experiences with non-therapeutic research on dying patients in the intensive care unit
- The child's perspective on discomfort during medical research procedures: a descriptive study
- A questionnaire on factors influencing children’s assent and dissent to non-therapeutic research
- Professional-patient relationships and informed consent
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- A study of consent for participation in a non-therapeutic study in the pediatric intensive care population
- Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
- The problem of informed consent in emergency medicine research