To stop or not to stop: dissent and undue burden as reasons to stop participation in paediatric research
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Acceptable risks and burdens for children in research without direct benefit: a systematic analysis of the decisions made by the Dutch Central Committee
- Drug development for children: how adequate is the current European ethical guidance?
- Ambiguous articles in new EU Regulation may lead to exploitation of vulnerable research subjects
- Improving the Helsinki Declaration's guidance on research in incompetent subjects
- Assent in paediatric research: theoretical and practical considerations
- Meeting the goal of concurrent adolescent and adult licensure of HIV prevention and treatment strategies
- Caregiver burden versus intensity of anxiety and depression symptoms in parents of children with cerebral palsy as well as factors potentially differentiating the level of burden: a cross-sectional study (Poland)
- Complex calculations: ethical issues in involving at-risk healthy individuals in dementia research
- Paediatric xenotransplantation clinical trials and the right to withdraw
- Prediction of caregiver burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a machine learning approach using random forests applied to a cohort study