Article Text
Abstract
Recent research indicates that there is a gap in life expectancy between the rich and the poor. This raises the question: should we on egalitarian grounds use income-based equity weights when we assess benefits of alternative benevolent interventions, so that health benefits to the poor count for more? This article provides three egalitarian arguments for using income-based equity weights under certain circumstances. If income inequality correlates with inequality in health, we have reason to use income-based equity weights on the ground that health inequality is bad. If income inequality correlates with inequality in opportunity for health, we have reason to use such weights on the ground that inequality in opportunity for health is bad. If income inequality correlates with inequality in well-being, income-based equity weights should be used to mitigate inequality in well-being. Three different ways in which to construe income-based equity weights are introduced and discussed. They can be based on relative income inequality, on income rankings and on capped absolute income. The article does not defend any of these types of weighting schemes, but argues that in order to settle which of these types of weighting scheme to choose, more empirical research is needed.
- Allocation of Health Care Resources
- Political Philosophy
- Health Economics
- Health Care Economics
- Distributive Justice
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding Forte, the Swedish Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (2014-2724).
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Quantifying changes in global health inequality: the Gini and Slope Inequality Indices applied to the Global Burden of Disease data, 1990–2017
- Widening inequalities in self-rated health by material deprivation? A trend analysis between 2001 and 2011 in Germany
- Socioeconomic inequalities in oral health in different European welfare state regimes
- Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health in Germany: a time-trend analysis of repeated cross-sectional health surveys between 2003 and 2012
- The equity impact of a universal child health promotion programme
- Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010
- Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 17 European countries between 1990 and 2010
- Educational and wealth inequalities in tobacco use among men and women in 54 low-income and middle-income countries
- Progress in reducing inequalities in cardiovascular disease mortality in Europe
- Income mortality paradox by immigrants’ duration of residence in Sweden: a population register-based study