Article Text
Abstract
With regard to ethics and legislation, what is the significant difference between a doctor terminating the life-supporting treatment of a patient in the course of his job and a greedy relative of the patient doing the same thing to inherit his wealth? Merkel offers an interesting and inventive answer to this question in terms of the improper violation of personal boundaries. However, despite Merkel's claim to the contrary, his answer does not directly address the question of the relevant ethical similarities and differences between killing and letting die in general. Furthermore, it does not provide the basis a plausible rationale for legislation concerning killing and letting die. The questions of whether letting someone die is ethically the same as killing someone and whether it should be treated the same way by the criminal law are not the same as or tantamount to the question of whether or not it involves the transgression of another person's boundaries.
- Euthanasia
- Killing
- Care of the Dying Patient
- Criminal Law
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon
- The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia
- On acts, omissions and responsibility
- Cursed lamp: the problem of spontaneous abortion
- Critical notice—Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith
- Spontaneous abortion and unexpected death: a critical discussion of Marquis on abortion
- The Two tragedies argument
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise