Citation Tools
PDFDisorders of consciousness
Can ‘Best Interests’ derail the trolley? Examining withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in patients in the permanent vegetative state
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Can ‘Best Interests’ derail the trolley? Examining withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in patients in the permanent vegetative state
Other content recommended for you
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- Withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration decisions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: best interests of the patients and advance directives are the keys
- Ethics briefing
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘Why I wrote my advance decision’
- Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state: ethical, legal and practical dilemmas
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- Commentary on Derick Wade's ‘Back to the bedside? Making clinical decisions in patients with prolonged unconsciousness’ and Zoe Fritz’ ‘Can ‘Best Interests’ derail the trolley?’ Examining withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in patients in the permanent vegetative state
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic