Article Text
Abstract
The ethics of benefit sharing has been a topical issue in global health research in resource-limited countries. It pertains to the distribution of goods, benefits and advantages to the research participants, communities and countries that are involved in research. One of the nuances in benefit sharing is the ethical justification on which the concept should be based. Extensive literature outlining the different principles underlying benefit sharing is available. The purpose of this paper is to examine the proposed principles using Aristotelian principles of justice. The paper assesses the central idea of Aristotelian justice and applies and evaluates this idea to benefit sharing in research, especially when commercial research sponsors conduct research in resource-limited countries. Two categories of Aristotelian justice—universal and particular—were examined and their contribution to the benefit-sharing discourse assessed. On the one hand, benefit sharing in accordance with universal justice requires that for-profit research sponsors obey the legal regulations and international standards set for benefit sharing. On the other hand, benefit sharing in accordance with particular justice transcends obeying legal requirements and standards to a realm of acting in an ethically accepted manner. Accordingly, the paper further examines three perspectives of particular justice and develops ethical justification for benefit sharing in global health research. As Aristotelian justice is still relevant to the contemporary discourse on justice, this paper broadens the ethical justifications of benefit sharing in global health research.
- International Affairs
- Philosophical Ethics
- Research Ethics
- Public Health Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Appropriateness of no-fault compensation for research-related injuries from an African perspective: an appeal for action by African countries
- Sharing the benefits of research fairly: two approaches
- What constitutes equitable data sharing in global health research? A scoping review of the literature on low-income and middle-income country stakeholders’ perspectives
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity
- How to prevent and address safeguarding concerns in global health research programmes: practice, process and positionality in marginalised spaces
- HIV prevention research and global inequality: steps towards improved standards of care*
- Should institutions fund the feedback of individual findings in genomic research?
- In need of remedy: US policy for compensating injured research participants
- Aligning the principles and practice of research integrity and research fairness in global health: a mixed-methods study
- Regulation of biomedical research in Africa